Knowing Your Options
For the past week we’ve all experienced a little taste of
kibbutz life in Israel. While Dorot and Ruhamma have been outstanding hosts,
they’ve also been our personal tour guides into alternate local governing
system. On our fourth night Ulla Hadar spoke to us about socialism on the
kibbutz. He describes socialism on the kibbutz as a collective agricultural
community that unanimously decides aspects of their life that affect the well-being of their entire community. Kibbutzim originated in Eastern Europe
during the late 1800s as a result of the Zionist movement and has mainly prospered
in Israel. He described early kibbutz living as a strict yet close knit community
that provided the needs of every member.
Although it is important to note that modern kibbutz life is
now geared towards privatization, industrialization, and more personal freedom,
I think it’s worthwhile to compare capitalism to their early socialism. This
comparison may help us understand why socialists were constantly targeted by
the government throughout early American history (See The Day Wall Street Exploded: A Story of America in Its First Age of
Terror by Beverly Gage). In the United States in order to survive
capitalism citizens must work for labor and their income is subject to the
whims of the market. Consequently, wages determine the type of education, food,
and clothing a person can afford. In contrast, on the kibbutz there was no wage
labor; members simply worked to provide subsistence for the members of the
kibbutz and then they would work to gain a profit for the community to share. In
return they would receive clothes, food, shelter, and education.
Though their needs were handled, they could not have any
private items, raise or teach their children, and they had to conform to
community norms rather than individual preferences. Ulla, for instance,
preferred sleeping with his parents when he was scared. Unfortunately for Ulla,
the kibbutz kept babies and children in a separate kibbutz. Despite his
preference, he was watched by a night guard almost every night to prevent him
from running away. He also discussed how his parents broke the mold when it
came to air conditioning and even vacations! Whereas in a capitalist society
individualism and privatization is praised. Mass consumption and suburban
lifestyles of the 1920s gave rise to public support of individual and material
preferences. For instance, my best friend will spend all his money on the
newest fashion whereas I would much rather prefer spending my money jewelry.
Either way our individual spending habits make up a part of our American
identity, whereas Ulla and his family’s behavior destroys the community’s
uniform identity.
Considering both options, it’s interesting to balance the
pros and cons of each society with your own preferences. Although there has
been a rapid decline in the number of kibbutzim, many people are traveling back
to receive the community closeness they once received. Although his talk
centered on kibbutz life, communal living is not confined to Israel. Several
different countries host socialist communes such as Germany, France, Niger, and
even the United States.1 Thus, we should always consider our options
when balancing our individual lives between the betterment of our local
community.
For more information on international commune living see
http://www.ic.org/directory/communes/
Comments
Post a Comment